The Trump administration's attacks on universities have led to a slowdown in hiring, with international academics particularly caught in the crossfire.
Colleges are being forced to navigate boththreats to federal fundingand immigration roadblocks, a landscape that many find increasingly untenable to navigate.
The U.S. has a reputation for research that some say will survive the Trump onslaught, but the real harm could be deterring future candidates from pursuing certain fields.
The pause in hiring began last year after the administration started pulling millions of dollars from elite universities, often citing allegations of antisemitism.
The loss of money led to hiring freezes at top universities such asHarvardand thousands to belaid offat Johns Hopkins University.
While some schools have reached deals with the administration to restore funding and others won it back in the courts, restoration has not translated to a resurgence in hiring.
"It's become much more complicated in the sense that we're spending a lot more time than we used to try to make the case for new positions, to justify how a new position is going to lead to enrollment growth … I have heard a lot more kind of consternation from counterparts around just the struggle to make the case for new positions. And, in some instances, just not being able to hire new faculty," said Kevin McClure, chair of the Department of Educational Leadership at the University of North Carolina-Wilmington.
While funding concerns plague hiring issues on the administrators' end, academics are also struggling with decisions over whether to even stay in their fields amid the turmoil.
Free speech concerns have hit U.S. and international academics as some states crack down on how professors can teach about certain topics such as race and gender, efforts largely supported by the White House
Even before the second Trump administration, the American Association of University Professors found in 2023 one in three academics were looking to leave Texas, Florida, Georgia and North Carolina, with 58 percent citing their state's political climate.
Recently, one professor wasfiredat the Texas A&M University for kicking out a student who challenged her teaching about more than two genders in an incident that went viral. The professor is currently suing for her job back.
In multiple red states, bans have been placed on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) offices, and DEI programs have been outlawed.
Other U.S. academics have discussedleaving outcertain words such as "equity" from government funding proposals over fear the Trump administration would outright reject their requests.
"The quality is not at the same level in the states that are imposing different kind of restrictions on academic freedom and also diversity equity, inclusion, and so the retention of quality scholars and also the attracting of that has been not great," said Mike Gavin, president and CEO of Alliance for Higher Education.
"There have been some states where the opposite effect is taking place, where you're seeing high-quality administrators and faculty apply and get jobs in states where there are protections of the same thing. So, you're seeing a major demographic shift that aligned with the legislative posture that each state takes with regard to academic freedom, institutional autonomy and, especially, diversity, equity, inclusion," he added.
Advertisement
U.S. students may also be less likely to go into certain fields afterRepublicans last year cappedhow much those going for particular degrees can borrow in federal student loans, with industries including nursing sounding the alarm on the future of their workforces.
That change could eventually impact universities' willingness to hire as they adjust their financial models,
But it could also affect universities willingness to hire as they may have to adjust their financial models, a possibility the GOP hopes will make higher education cheaper.
Foreign professors have even more perilous waters to navigate, with arecent lawsuitalleging the First Amendment rights of non-citizen academics have been violated.
The Trump administration began a policy last year to bar researchers who study fact-checking and social media due to fears the work could lead to censorship of Americans.
The policy has caused foreign-born professors and faculty to self-censor or be barred from entering the country, according to the lawsuit.
The Trump administration's introduction of a $100,000 H-1B visa fee also harms the prospects of getting international talent into American universities, with some not wanting to take on the high cost to bring these individuals in.
"There are certainly challenges attracting international academics, more broadly, some of that is driven by just concerns about U.S. politics, but a lot of its driven by the H-1B visa issue, where, if you get $100,000 to hire a person in much of academia, there are other people who could potentially have those positions who are Americans. It's more challenging in fields like engineering, where there are a lot of very well qualified international graduates," said Robert Kelchen, professor and head of the Department of Education Leadership and Policy Studies at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
The chaos in the U.S. higher education system has led some foreign countries to try to take advantage and attract talented academics to their schools.
Spain, Denmark, China and others are offering research money, relocation assistance and other benefits to lure U.S. academics away, with some success.
"We're going to get a smaller share of the world's top talent just because of the difficulties in coming to the U.S., but I don't think we're going to lose a lot of top American talent to other countries. That's something that it just seems to be a pretty rare event, and much of the world, outside of China, doesn't provide anywhere near the level of federal support for higher education that the U.S. has, especially in research," Kelchen said.
There could also be some long-term hiring consequences in the U.S., even if academics don't try to go to another country.
"As an example, if you've got people who are completing their doctorates, they're considering an academic job, but they're doing so in an environment where there is a lot of uncertainty. There are some real questions about the financial viability of some institutions. It means that the prospect of stepping into a faculty job is a little riskier than it was in the past. In a variety of ways, it's more politically risky and maybe more financially risky," McClure said.
"We're probably going to see fewer applicants who, themselves, are coming from a lower income background, fewer applicants whose research is in an area that is important and studies underserved communities … And so, we may see less diversity in individuals that are pursuing faculty careers," he added.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to The Hill.
