New Photo - Instead of T-Shirts and Tanks, This Jumper Trend Makes Stove-Pipe Jeans Look Chicest

An early-autumn staple.

Full Article on Source: VENUS MAG

#LALifestyle #USCelebrities

Instead of T-Shirts and Tanks, This Jumper Trend Makes Stove-Pipe Jeans Look Chicest

An early-autumn staple. Full Article on Source: VENUS MAG #LALifestyle #USCelebrities
New Photo - Melania Trump kicks off first public appearance in a month with tongue-in-cheek joke about her absence

Melania Trump kicks off first public appearance in a month with tongue-in-cheek joke about her absence First Lady Melania Trump made her first public appearance in more than a month as she delivered remarks from the White House to tout her foster care initiative. “Good afternoon. I heard you missed me,” she said as she addressed a crowd at the Rose Garden on Thursday.

Full Article on Source: VENUS MAG

#LALifestyle #USCelebrities

Melania Trump kicks off first public appearance in a month with tongue-in-cheek joke about her absence

Melania Trump kicks off first public appearance in a month with tongue-in-cheek joke about her absence First Lady Melania Trump made her ...
Patriots' Kyle Williams reacts to Mike Vrabel's grueling OTAs practice

New England Patriotswide receiver Kyle Williams was clearly exhausted after Day 2 of organized team activities.

USA TODAY

He took to social media in the immediate aftermath of practice and claimed that it felt like he had gone through a training camp practice.

“Ain’t no way OTA’s feeling like training camp🤦🏽‍♂️N it’s only day 2????????”Williams posted on Instagramon Wednesday.

Patriotscoach Mike Vrabel has the team locked in during the spring practices. They are coming off a wildly successful season where they won the AFC East division, won the AFC championship and competed in the Super Bowl. Vrabel isn't shying away from keeping the team focused on the goal of picking right back up where they left off last season.

Advertisement

Williams recorded 10 catches for 209 yards and three touchdowns last season. He could be in line to have a big sophomore campaign, with the team now trusting him to line up at multiple spots at receiver.

The third-round pick out of Washington State showed flashes of breaking out last season. There will be an even bigger spotlight on him in 2026, and it could play a major role in how the team views him long-term.

Follow Patriots Wire onTwitterandFacebook.

This article originally appeared on Patriots Wire:Patriots' Kyle Williams reacts to Mike Vrabel's grueling OTAs practice

Patriots' Kyle Williams reacts to Mike Vrabel's grueling OTAs practice

New England Patriotswide receiver Kyle Williams was clearly exhausted after Day 2 of organized team activities. He took to social...
Details of Seahawks LB Dante Fowler Jr.’s contract emerge

Details ofSeattle Seahawksedge rusher Dante Fowler Jr.‘s deal with the team have emerged.

USA TODAY

According to ESPN’s Brady Henderson,Fowler has the potential to earn a total of $5 million on the one-year deal he signed with Seattle in free agency.

“TheSeahawks' one-year deal for OLB Dante Fowler Jr. has a base value of $2.5M with $500K guaranteed, which was his signing bonus. The base salary is $1.32M,” Henderson said. “There's $680K in per-game roster bonuses.”

Advertisement

Fowler recorded three sacks and three passes defended in 2025 as a member of the Dallas Cowboys. The Seahawks signed the Florida native after losing Boye Mafe in free agency.

The 31-year-old will play in a Seahawks rotation on the edge that also includes DeMarcus Lawrence, Derick Hall and Uchenna Nwosu next season. Fowler’s deal with the Seahawks is the lowest that he’s garnered in his career.

This article originally appeared on Seahawks Wire:Seahawks LB Dante Fowler Jr.’s contract terms revealed

Details of Seahawks LB Dante Fowler Jr.’s contract emerge

Details ofSeattle Seahawksedge rusher Dante Fowler Jr.‘s deal with the team have emerged. According to ESPN’s Brady Henderson,Fow...
35 former judges ask court to investigate Trump's deal with IRS

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of 35 federal judges asked a federal court in Florida to reopen the legal case betweenPresident Donald Trumpand the Internal Revenue Service and investigate whether the two parties' out-of-court settlement was an act of fraud against the court.

USA TODAY

In a May 27 court filing, the ex-judges contend Trump and co-plaintiffs failed to mention a planned settlement in their motion to withdraw the lawsuit against the IRS. In exchange for Trump voluntarily withdrawing the lawsuit, the Justice Department last week agreed to createa much-criticized $1.766 billion "anti-weaponization" fundthat could funnel payments to Trump's political allies.

"The Court was deceived," the 24-page motion reads, adding that the settlement "commandeers the contrived sum of $1.776 billion from the United States Treasury, to be handed out to recipients chosen by a commission effectively controlled by the President."

More:Trump digs in over $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund amid GOP backlash

Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche takes his seat to testify before a Senate subcommittee on the Justice Department's proposed 2027 budget on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., May 19, 2026.

Trump effectively sued the government that he leads when hefiled suit against the IRS and Treasury Department in Januaryseeking $10 billion in damages over the agency's past leak of his tax returns.

Voluntarily withdrawing the lawsuit meant the judge assigned to the case, U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams, did not rule on the case's merits ‒ nor did the judge weigh in on the settlement that plaintiffs reached with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Trump's former personal attorney.

"The purported 'settlement' that the parties never placed before this Court raises profound questions about the parties’ candor toward the Court and manipulation of the judicial system, which threatens to undermine confidence in the administration of justice," the 35 former judges said in their motion.

They said reopening the case would allow the court to "commence an inquiry into whether the Court was deceived, including with respect to the existence of an underlying case or controversy and any purported arms-length negotiations undertaken to resolve it."

U.S. President Donald Trump points his finger during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room at the White House, in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 27, 2026. REUTERS/Evan Vucci

Settlement was not 'legally justified,' ex-judges say

Among the former judges asking the court to reopen the case is former U.S. District Court Judge Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative judge who was one of the star witnesses of the House January 6 Select Committee hearings.

Although none of the ex-judges are parties in the suit, theycited a federal rule of civil procedurewhereby a federal court can set aside a judgment over fraud against the court.

Advertisement

More:Why Trump’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund has caused such a stir

"To be clear, the parties’ settlement was not, and never will be, legally justified," the motion reads, arguing Blanche wrongfully invoked the AG's authorities to award judgments and compromise settlements when he created the anti-weaponization fund. "Both of those authorities require the existence of a legitimate litigation and not, as here, one that is collusive, feigned, or fraudulent."

The agreement with the IRS also includesa guarantee that the tax agency will no longerpursue any claims over tax liabilitiesit may have against Trump, his family members and his companies.

Trump and his administration have faced intense bipartisan criticism over the anti-weaponization fund, which has few guardrails over the distribution of funds.

Michael Luttig, advisor to former U.S. Vice President Mike Pence and a former U.S. federal judge, testifies during the third of eight planned public hearings of the U.S. House Select Committee to investigate the January 6 Attack on the United States Capitol.

Blanche has said anyone is welcome to apply for compensation, yet the fund was conceived to pay individuals whom Trump and others say were unfairly targeted by prosecutors in past Democratic administrations. Blanche and other administration officials have not ruled out checks going to the nearly 1,600 Trump supporters who violently stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, including those convicted of assaulting police officers.

More:Jan. 6 police officers sue to block Trump's $1.8B 'slush fund' for 'insurrectionists'

A five-person committee, with each member appointed by Blanche, will be in charge of deciding which complainants are rewarded money from the fund, according to the Justice Department.

Two police officers who defended the U.S. Capitol during the Jan. 6 attacksued the Trump administration in a bidto block the anti-weaponization fund.

Trump has defended the fund amid the backlash, writing last week on Truth Social that he is "helping others, who were so badly abused by an evil, corrupt, and weaponized Biden Administration, receive, at long last, JUSTICE!"

Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY:35 former judges ask court to investigate Trump's deal with IRS

35 former judges ask court to investigate Trump's deal with IRS

WASHINGTON — A bipartisan group of 35 federal judges asked a federal court in Florida to reopen the legal case betweenPresident Donald ...

 

UR MAG © 2015 | Distributed By My Blogger Themes | Designed By Templateism.com